Staredit Network

I posted a topic in Serious discussion, about how Star's should just entertain and not give out there political views in there shows

I dont fully type out my words because its fukin internet, I think it's bs, kuz you all know what each word is.

and also DT broke the SEN rules



And before you say ' You deserved it ' Why treat someone like that anyways? I dont know why he got mad probably because I said Liberlism is a Mental Disorder, witch I think is right. but w/e

I still think calling me a clueless Idiot, didnt make much sense of what I type'd.

Personally if DT is going to cry over something I wrote then my statement stands

Liberals do have a mental disorder. and I think that DT admin of all people. But w/e he's going to get away with it of course. but Just wanted to state of how Im feeling. Lol

once again...

LIBERALISM IS A MENTAL DISORDER

We are all human. Sometimes, even such a cold-blooded robot like DTBK can let soose his real feelings and emotions. Although he should have just locked the topic.

Oh, and 1VeN 1f d1z 1z 1nt3rn3t U $huD3 sT1LLL r!t3 1N n0rmaL 1ngL1$Hz. Because this is a forum, not a chat room, you have plenty of time to make your posts.

I actually agree with GTi, this isn't the first time I've seen members of higher status, or older members insult a newer member. Even Kellimus got away with insulting newer members.. :\

I had no idea that conseratives and moderates followed all of their own rules to the letter.

EDIT: Personally, I think you got off pretty easy with a flame by DT. If anything, he should've warned you for the censor evasions/swearing such as "fukin" and "shiet".

And yes, you should be using proper grammar and spelling ESPECIALLY in Serious Discussion.

I also got away with that. If you feel unhappy about it, complain to mother nature for making the stronger one being able to use his power too much on the weak one.

I doubt this topic deserves to live. Move on with your life, and remember that SEN is not what must trouble you too much.

So is that how you want SEN to stand by? The older members can flame the newer members because they are new?

And just so you know, when I was referring to Kellimus insulting somebody, I was referring to you.. I'm pretty sure he called you a burder to the serious discussion forum.

And to moose, if he breaks the rules, then he should deserve a warn. Since when are you allowed to flame people for breaking rules..?

Yes, Kellimus insulted me. So what? He insulted a lot of people too much to stay here.

But it's really how things work - the newbs get attacked for some time.

Um...you were flaming:

That is quite clearly flame...let people hold their opinions. And although I'm certainly no admin, I'm pretty darn sure that the rules suggest you take up this sort of thing in PMs.

I was just telling you, giving one of my examples.

And I know, and that's the problem. I don't think the newbs should be attacked, it's not fair..

I've removed DT's flame anyway. It doesn't matter if he's DT, he still shouldn't be flaming. GTi, you may lock this topic if you wish. Otherwise, just write better when posting in Serious Discussion.

Is it fair when one baby is born with genetic disorders, and another one is born healthy?

I'm taking sides on SEN. Sorry but the rules also state this



Plus krusers admin status gives him the

CAN:
* delete your account
* IP-Ban you
* warn/suspend/fine you
* edit your account info
* moderate in all forums
* manage all sections of the site
* add/remove forums and anything else
* contact your ISP and get your internet owned
* do whatever the f*ck they want

Hm... can't say I'm too keen on giving him the last one yet.

Actions like that of your first post here give non-liberals a bad name.

And as it's said before, this is a FORUM, not a CHAT ROOM. People here actually think, unlike in AOL chat rooms, of which I'm sure you're familliar by looking at the way you type. Please, think carefully about what you type, and proof-read what you do type. It will give you a good name.

DTBK shouldn't have flamed, but he is an admin, and the forum does say that your writing has to be readable, as well as 'no censor evasion'.

It's very stupid to make a topic implicating administrators; now the administrator (who is the best moderator on the forum) *might* have it in for you.

As said before, there is a certain saying in the FAQ forum - Administrators can do whatever the f*ck they want. This is emphasized by Moose evading the censors in that post. I doubt a little complaint on flaming would get you anywhere.

Rather than go into the minutiae of why you are wrong, and why DT was right to lock your topic, I'll just point out a few technical errors you made in this post:



F- lololololol

The items in bold are instances where you have failed to show a basic grasp of English spelling, punctuation, grammar and correct usage. I haven't even marked the omissions of punctuation. Essentially, there is a lack of articulation present that makes your statements and arguments appear simple and childish. However, we shouldn't penalise on those grounds alone unless posts are illegible. If you have dyslexia then I apologise for ridiculing your English.

Your supposed point, that media celebrities should not engage in politics, is perhaps valid, yet your main point seems to be that Liberalism is a mental disorder. Rather than quote NSDAP member Michael Savage because you think he is a masterful wit, I ask you to define 'Liberalism' in both political and economic terms and then look back at the collection of misconceptions that made up your original attack on that ideology.

You evaded the censors too.

first off its called abrievating the word's so you dont have to type it all out.

and im not typing 1's and 2's and 3's to make letters. and no I never had AOL the reason why I type like the way I do is because every game does it, Starcraft, Diablo, Tibia, Every game. and Yha I agree I should have been more Mature in writing my sentence in serious discussion.

Anyways yha.

[F-] stands for? FANTASTIC right? ^_^

You'll find that with good grammar your arguments will be taken more seriously. As shown in this topic. kekeke

P.S.: It is readable, if you are a Old member to SEN yes its very much readable.
How do I know? well you corrected my paragraph, leaving to be you knew what everything was to correct it. or else you wouldnt know what to correct because it wouldn't be readable.

but it's all over now, Im glad it got situatied in a non-violent matter with Cyber kussing and Cyber kicking and punching and all of them things Lol

P.S.: Isnt Lol <-- used in AOL? ; ) Ok ok im done : (

Thanks everyone. !! Imma go work on my Horror Map ^_^

If one is given treatment to be fixed, and the other one isn't, then no, I wouldn't consider that fair. SEN has a chance to be better, but instead of improving a fault, they say "that's how SEN works"? What good of a mentality is that?

Also, I don't want to jump onto DTBK, because this is one of the few mistakes that he has made, but if you want to stop flaming on SEN, it would only make sense for the admins to not flame themselves, correct? Sure, admins probably can do whatever they want... but what about the message they are sending out.

EDIT: Ermm, I said yes somewhere where I meant no.

In order to have a serious discussion, you have to type in a serious format. This crap you are spewing out does not look serious and just makes you look like a fool. You might have had a case, somewhat, against DTBK's flame if you would have actually taken it up in a more proper way. Not that I can blame DTBK, trying to read your posts gets very frustrating.

End of story.