I was going to make a same-sex marriage thread, FireKame, but you beat me to it. Ahem...
Okay, first of all, I'd like to pose a question: "How will same-sex marriages threaten the institution of marriage?" Everyone try and think of an answer to that. Here's my answer - it won't. Yet the bill proposed by the Bush administration would ban them for that very reason. Well, let's try to get to the deeper issue here, which is prejudice. But first things first, let's hit the facts on the head. If gay marriage is legalized, heterosexual couples will still be able to be married. Marriage is a politically-recognized status, and not necessarily a religious one. Yet Bush is assuming that his religious definition of marriage applies to everyone in America. If we ban gay marriages because they don't fit the Evangelical Christian definition of marriage, then we should also ban Islamic marriages and Jewish marriages, as they don't fit the bill either. Bush's argument is already fundamentally flawed, and I've only written a few sentences. Now, on to the real issue: prejudice. The people who want to ban gay marriage are afraid. They're afraid of people who are different from them. They find butt sex repulsive (as do I, as a matter of fact). And so, in an effort to stop people from doing it, or an effort toget revenge on these people for putting such a nasty idea in their heads, they have tried to pass this bill. But what exactly gives the Bush administration the right to decide how other people should live their lives. Who says that they are the moral authority, who always knows what is right? According to Bush's own beliefs, it is not his place to judge his fellow man. In attempting to do so he does nothing but undermine his own credibility. No matter how much I dislike the idea of gay men having sex (or hitting on me), I have no opposition to other people finding happiness. Their bodies are their own, and they can do whatever they want with them.
Anyone have any comments or anything? I want to hear some other points of view.
Edit:
QUOTE(Beer_Keg[eM)
]Heck no same-sex marriages shouldn't adopt. It's just plain wierd. Same-sex can't have babies for a reason and for that reason they shouldn't get adoption.
2 gay men raising a boy... boy turns gay or both ways
If they raise a girl, girl will be a psycho
2 lesbians raising a girl... girl goes lesbian or both ways
If they raise a boy, boy goes both ways
It's just plain wierd, although it's their life and I'm not supposed to care...
Plain wierd having 2 fathers or 2 moms...
The child will have severe psychological damage and sexual mind damage because he/she don't know if gay/straight is right or wrong
Holy crap, man. What can I say to this? You offer NO PROOF to back up your irrational statements, and you assume that your version of right and wrong applies to everyone else... How close-minded can you get?
Okay, here's my question for you: What exactly makes you think that two men raising a child will automatically transform that child into a homosexual or bisexual person? I have a lot of gay friends, and every single one of them tells me that they knew that something about them was different before they ever consciously thought about their sexuality. They said that they were just born that way. By the way, just out of curiosity, just how many gay people have you actually met in your life?