who do you think? i say kerry. YAY KERRY!
bush is a lying idiot who is fighting his father's war...
The best arguement is as follows:
Vote Kerry.
Because he's not Bush!
People can say whatever they want about Kerry, but it's a two-party system. So please, vote Kerry, not Nader.
How the fυck is he a lyer?
liar**
How tried to justify the war in Iraq. That was a lie. Explain otherwise.
Bush sucks. Kerry sucks more. Vote Bush.
Obviously you guys don't know

about Kerry, you just think he must automatically be better then Bush which he isn't.
Bush sucks more than Kerry. You don't know how Kerry will be at presidency. However, from what I can tell, Bush is a

tart who has no idea what he's doing. He's like the average football player, would you want your football player (with his crappy brain) to be president? Of course not. Kerry is at least smarter and from the debates, knows what he is doing.
im gonna go with.... kerry. do you know why?
1. hes not bush
2. hes not bush
3. hes not bush
4. hes not bush
5. i feel like playing halo.....
QUOTE(SaLaCiouS(U) @ Oct 17 2004, 07:46 PM)
Kerry sucks.
Bush sucks more. Vote
Kerry.
Obviously you don't know

about
Bush, you just think he must automatically be better then
Kerry which he isn't.
[right][snapback]85984[/snapback][/right]
Anyone who watched the debates would tell you right now how much smarter and better-suited Kerry is. It's not even competition. Unfortunately, Karl Rove and

Cheney are masters of spin, and we've seen their influence bring Bush into America's eyes as a leader and not the "drunken fratboy" type of thinker that he has proven himself to be time and again.
Anyone who would vote for a candidate who invited attacks on his own troops is ignorant and misguided.
[sarcasm]My mum would make a better president[/sarcasm]
Bush: (long awkward pause, once again looking more like a chimp that most normal humans) NEW-CUE-LER
Kerry: The President's actions to invade Iraq were irrational (hands waving back and forth) and without evidence. In fact, the fact is, Iraq doesn't even have weapons of mass destruction! However (hand waving back and forth), if I was President, I would have made the right choice because we know that Iraq has weapons of mass desctruction (contradictory to what he just said).
Note: Bush's quotes are a lot easier to remember because they're so short. Kerry's quote above was something I suppose he might have said but he talks alot and distracts with his hands. Ergo, I got at least what Saturday Night Live had portrayed him as.
QUOTE(SaLaCiouS(U) @ Oct 17 2004, 07:46 PM)
Bush sucks. Kerry sucks more. Vote Bush.
Obviously you guys don't know

about Kerry, you just think he must automatically be better then Bush which he isn't.
[right][snapback]85984[/snapback][/right]
[center]
STFU, SALACIOUS(U)[/center]
You haven't the absolute SLIGHTEST clue what you're talking about!
QUOTE(DT_Battlekruser @ Oct 17 2004, 09:10 PM)
Kerry sucks. Bush sucks more. Vote Kerry.
Obviously you don't know

about Bush, you just think he must automatically be better then Kerry which he isn't.
QUOTE
You haven't the absolute SLIGHTEST clue what you're talking about!
Don't yell at him. If y'all haven't noticed, you're all giving the same exact reasons why not to vote for [fill in the blank]: because people don't know how much they suck.
Well, don't say the other person's stupid because they don't know; actually start giving facts instead of "STFU".
QUOTE(pcfredz @ Oct 18 2004, 03:18 PM)
Bush: (long awkward pause, once again looking more like a chimp that most normal humans) NEW-CUE-LER
Kerry: The President's actions to invade Iraq were irrational (hands waving back and forth) and without evidence. In fact, the fact is, Iraq doesn't even have weapons of mass destruction! However (hand waving back and forth), if I was President, I would have made the right choice because we know that Iraq has weapons of mass desctruction (contradictory to what he just said).
Note: Bush's quotes are a lot easier to remember because they're so short. Kerry's quote above was something I suppose he might have said but he talks alot and distracts with his hands. Ergo, I got at least what Saturday Night Live had portrayed him as.
[right][snapback]86169[/snapback][/right]
Okay, first of all, if you're going to quote someone make sure that you're not just making

up. Use things the persona actually said. Second of all, you obviously didn't watch the debate, because what you just said reeks of Fox News' "debate spin" techniques, where they take things out of context and present to you their version of John Kerry instead of the one who actually handled any questions on Iraq with grace and ease.
Let's get this straight - John Kerry never once contradicted himself. His position is and has always been this: He thought Iraq was a threat, but would have handled the threat differently. Thus, voting to move on the Iraq crisis and then protesting the President's mishandling of the situation is totally consistent.
Next time, WATCH THE DEBATE. Until you do, you have no right to make assumptions and present them as fact.
Bush!
Not voting for Bush, but voting against Kerry.
Heard from rumors:
Kerry agrees to go to war, or doesn't try to stop it.
Then he decides to go against sending guns & ammo.
No idea if thats accurate.
Note: I watched the debates. If I didn't listen to rumors about Kerry, then Kerry all the way.
I DID watch the debates. However Kerry WAS called a flipper-flopper. Personally if I could vote for Kerry, I WOULD. However, that particular episode of Saturday Night Live was particularly funny. Sorry if my second last post sounded like bovine fecal matter.
So instead of actually investigating the flip-flop rumor for yourself, you just decided that it must be true? I don't get your logic. Just because he was called a flip-flopper doesn't make him one. Judge him by what he's said and done, not just by what his opponent says he has said and done.
QUOTE(RexyRex @ Oct 18 2004, 04:44 PM)
Bush!
Not voting for Bush, but voting against Kerry.
Heard from rumors:
Kerry agrees to go to war, or doesn't try to stop it.
Then he decides to go against sending guns & ammo.
No idea if thats accurate.
Note: I watched the debates. If I didn't listen to rumors about Kerry, then Kerry all the way.
[right][snapback]86312[/snapback][/right]
GG loser Rexy.

Bush's IQ = 91, one day i came across an IQ test and it showed famous people's IQs. They culd be faking it tho.
Albert Eistein (sorri can't spell) = IQ 196, even Albert never took an IQ test before.
I vote for Bush, I watched THE DEBATS, Kerry said that we should of when to war in the past before we did when to war. Now Kerry says that we shouldn't go had got to war, If it weren't for Bush all of those people at Iraq wouldn't be free from the Dictoar, You know Saddam, Saddam did so much

to his own people! His people were mostly living in Hell! And look Kerry disagrees that we should of when to war when he supported it. I been watching ever since they started the electing. Thats my whole reason.
OFFTOPIC: I also hope that we don't go into a Civil War on this website. Lmao!
Well, obviously you didn't listen to what Kerry said, because you're taking things out of context.
Yes, I'll admit Kerry is a better public speaker.
A couple things to keep in mind, Kerry was at a SPA all day before his debates, relaxing, getting comfortable. President Bush was doing his job, helping the people in Florida, by the time the debates were on, President Bush was tired. ok?
I guess he didn't plan his schedule properly, then. But that fact is just another strike against him. The ability to plan ahead is what he lacks, and is exactly why he's not suited to being President, IMO.
People say that others criticize Bush just because America was in a tough time. However, Bush's response to 9/11 was what ANY president would have done. If he didn't do THAT, he'd have lost his job in 2001. What sucked for the world was that he later deployed troops in Iraq, syphoning billions of dollars from more important things like education to pursue what his father didn't finish! Now the children of America will grow up to be stupid and our next presidents will probably be even worse than Bush (... if that's even possible)!

Kerry didn't conflict himself. The media had to spin stuff up so as not to show that they too realize Kerry's a better person. He meant that he would have went to war sooner, just NOT AGAINST IRAQ. Sheesh.