Staredit Network

Staredit Network -> Concepts -> (U)beCalc Bugs/Suggestions

Report, edit, etc...Posted by LegacyWeapon on 2006-08-13 at 21:01:23

(U)beCalc can be found here: http://www.clanunknown.net/ubecalc.php

(U)beCalc(2) Beta can be found here: http://www.clanunknown.net/euds/ubecalc2.php
• Complete for version 1.12b actions & default data.
• Working on 1.12b conditions.
• Next 1.14 conditions.

If you have any bugs or suggestions you'd like to report, please post them here.

Known Bugs
None.

Suggestions
None.

I will add any bugs unfixed to the list and remove them when they are fixed.
Suggestions will be added to the list when implemented.

Note to self:
EUD Actions patched 1.13b

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mr_Mooo_Cow(U) on 2006-08-13 at 22:14:09

omgzors like... i was totally using this.. and like it wa sooooo amazing. i almost like wanted to like you know like.. hug legacy like totally. i was like is this alien technology or something? then i thought.. like omgzors of course legacy made it duhhh yeah like totally... i love it. it owns memcalc.

--sincerely MMC

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Nayed on 2006-08-13 at 23:02:37

Umm... how do you work it? Yeah ima newb shutup lol.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mr_Mooo_Cow(U) on 2006-08-14 at 00:06:52

Break-it-down-hooked-on-phonics-style time!
Step #1 : Select your local starcraft patch version (current version = 1.14)
Step #2 : Enter in the hex data of your choice (requires memory searcher)
Step #3 : Use your eyes to read the information you need (deaths, player, etc.)

Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2006-08-14 at 01:04:23

*ups production table on memcalc 5

Report, edit, etc...Posted by O)FaRTy1billion on 2006-08-14 at 01:12:43

Finally something we can rely on that wont have server errors whenever you need it.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2006-08-14 at 03:11:10

Server errors are the server's problem, not mine.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by O)FaRTy1billion on 2006-08-14 at 03:13:41

I didn't say it was your problem, did I? I'm just saying at least this one works.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mr_Mooo_Cow(U) on 2006-08-14 at 03:29:15

burn.

to make this post not pointless :
please report any bugs the data returned hasn't been verified

p.s. anyone notice changes in starcraft memory structure + anti-hack? maybe there is another thread.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by LegacyWeapon on 2006-08-14 at 10:05:33

Now to upload all the data files so I can access them and create an online version of Ube2's EUD editor.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by DiscipleOfAdun on 2006-08-15 at 15:12:00

QUOTE(Mr_Mooo_Cow(U))

p.s. anyone notice changes in starcraft memory structure?

Since you asked: YES. There is a change in the Unit Table. The size and position of several items is changed. And No, I don't have those yet.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Mr_Mooo_Cow(U) on 2006-08-15 at 16:13:32

QUOTE(DiscipleOfAdun @ Aug 15 2006, 02:11 PM)

QUOTE(Mr_Mooo_Cow(U))

p.s. anyone notice changes in starcraft memory structure?

Since you asked: YES. There is a change in the Unit Table. The size and position of several items is changed. And No, I don't have those yet.[/color]
[right][snapback]545330[/snapback][/right]

I wasn't just asking about the 'unit table' I was asking about the memory structure as a whole

I noticed small but odd changes, odd changes as in unlike the previous patches where they just move stuff around.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by DiscipleOfAdun on 2006-08-15 at 19:49:11

Right. It's just the unit table is a large part of the memory. However, it seems there's more stuff in some cases, and less in others. Also, it appears things weren't just 'shifted' as before. This is probably the result of the new source build.(In other words, it appears the source code was changed in building 1.14

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Xx.Doom.xX on 2006-08-20 at 11:21:13

Sweet!

So this is kinda like Memcalc? Or is this different? Im confused a little over this.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by LegacyWeapon on 2006-08-20 at 11:43:47

It basically does the same things. (U)beCalc has the latest v1.14 and other older versions of SC. MemCalc, I believe, is still calibrated to v1.13f.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2006-08-20 at 11:52:30

MemCalc is getting screwed by the server, but MemCalc 5 has the raw converter for 1.14 now, even though the server is just a pile or crap. The old MemCalc is for 1.13f though.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Xx.Doom.xX on 2006-08-20 at 13:42:31

O ok.

Thanks for the info!

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Doodle77(MM) on 2006-09-02 at 14:13:34

It has a tendency to give me player ID -5???

Report, edit, etc...Posted by LegacyWeapon on 2006-09-02 at 15:31:25

What are you inputting?

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Doodle77(MM) on 2006-09-02 at 15:45:24

005193E4 - mouse y position.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by LegacyWeapon on 2006-09-02 at 15:56:39

It seems Blizzard has moved some things to behind the memory location of the death counts table. Make sure you are checking the correct version and have the correct memory location. If the "Offset from Deaths of P1 Marines:" is negative, there's nothing you can do.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by DT_Battlekruser on 2006-09-02 at 17:10:36

I highly doubt that's the right offset; it's a good ~0x0007000 below the table.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by Doodle77(MM) on 2006-09-02 at 23:55:13

Whatever, there were other offsets containing the same value, and yes, that is a valid offset, its just behind the unit table.

Report, edit, etc...Posted by yoni45 on 2006-09-11 at 01:32:19

QUOTE(LegacyWeapon @ Sep 2 2006, 01:56 PM)

Can't we use one of the other systems that might potentially be further back in the memory table? I believe Extended Alliance Status values were ones that could have been used for a similar effect, although I'm guessing Alliance Status can't really set or check a particular value other than 0 or 1... (tbh, I forget the others, but there were a few... Looking through the condition list, "Kills" also looks like something that can be used...)

Next Page (1)